<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Andreas Rücklé - Publications</title>
    <link>http://rueckle.net/rss/publications</link>
    <description>RSS feed for the publications of Andreas Rücklé</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:27:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Exploring Data Generation Methods for the Story Cloze Test</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/Story-Cloze-Baseline/</link>
      <description>The Story Cloze test (Mostafazadeh et al.,
2016) is a recent effort in providing a common test scenario for text understanding
systems. As part of the LSDSem 2017
shared task, we present a system based on
a deep learning architecture combined with
a rich set of manually-crafted linguistic features. The system outperforms all known
baselines for the task, suggesting that the
chosen approach is promising. We additionally present two methods for generating further training data based on stories
from the ROCStories corpus. Our system
and generated data are publicly available
on GitHub.
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>End-to-End Non-Factoid Question Answering with an Interactive Visualization of Neural Attention Weights</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/QA-Attention-Visualization/</link>
      <description>Advanced attention mechanisms are an important part of successful neural network
approaches for non-factoid answer selection because they allow the models to focus
on few important segments within rather
long answer texts. Analyzing attention
mechanisms is thus crucial for understanding strengths and weaknesses of particular
models. We present an extensible, highly
modular service architecture that enables
the transformation of neural network models for non-factoid answer selection into
fully featured end-to-end question answering systems. The primary objective of our
system is to enable researchers a way to interactively explore and compare attentionbased neural networks for answer selection. Our interactive user interface helps
researchers to better understand the capabilities of the different approaches and can
aid qualitative analyses. The source-code
of our system is publicly available.
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Representation Learning for Answer Selection with LSTM-Based Importance Weighting</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/LSTM-Self-Attention-Answer-Selection/</link>
      <description>We present an approach to non-factoid answer selection with a separate component based on
BiLSTM to determine the importance of segments in the input. In contrast to other recently proposed
attention-based models within the same area, we determine the importance while assuming the
independence of questions and candidate answers. Experimental results show the effectiveness of our
approach, which outperforms several state-of-the-art attention-based models on the recent non-factoid
answer selection datasets InsuranceQA v1 and v2. We show that it is possible to perform effective
importance weighting for answer selection without relying on the relatedness of questions and answers.
The source code of our experiments is publicly available.
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Real-Time News Summarization with Adaptation to Media Attention</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/Real-Time-News-Summarization/</link>
      <description>Real-time summarization of news events (RTS) allows persons to stay up-to-date on important topics that develop over time. With the occurrence of major sub-events, media attention increases and a large number of news articles are published. We propose a summarization approach that detects such changes and selects a suitable summarization configuration at run-time. In particular, at times with high media attention, our approach exploits the redundancy in content to produce a more precise summary and avoid emitting redundant information. We find that our approach significantly outperforms a strong non-adaptive RTS baseline in terms of the emitted summary updates and achieves the best results on a recent web-scale dataset. It can successfully be applied to a different real-world dataset without requiring additional modifications.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Concatenated Power Mean Word Embeddings as Universal Cross-Lingual Sentence Representations</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/Power-Mean-Embeddings/</link>
      <description>Average word embeddings are a common baseline for more sophisticated sentence embedding techniques. However, they typically fall short of the performances of more complex models such as InferSent. Here, we generalize the concept of average word embeddings to power mean word embeddings. We show that the concatenation of different types of power mean word embeddings considerably closes the gap to state-of-the-art methods monolingually and substantially outperforms these more complex techniques cross-lingually. In addition, our proposed method outperforms different recently proposed baselines such as SIF and Sent2Vec by a solid margin, thus constituting a much harder-to-beat monolingual baseline. Our data and code are publicly available.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PD3: Better Low-Resource Cross-Lingual Transfer By Combining Direct Transfer and Annotation Projection</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/Cross-Lingual-Transfer-Argument-Mining/</link>
      <description>We consider unsupervised cross-lingual transfer on two tasks, viz., sentence-level argumentation mining and standard POS tagging. We combine direct transfer using bilingual embeddings with annotation projection, which projects labels across unlabeled parallel data. We do so by either merging respective source and target language datasets or alternatively by using multi-task learning. Our combination strategy considerably improves upon both direct transfer and projection with few available parallel sentences, the most realistic scenario for many low-resource target languages.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>COALA: A Neural Coverage-Based Approach for Long Answer Selection with Small Data</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/COALA/</link>
      <description>Current neural network based community question answering (cQA) systems fall short of (1) properly handling long answers which are common in cQA; (2) performing under small data conditions, where a large amount of training data is unavailable—i.e., for some domains in English and even more so for a huge number of datasets in other languages; and (3) benefiting from syntactic information in the model—e.g., to differentiate between identical lexemes with different syntactic roles. In this paper, we propose COALA, an answer selection approach that (a) selects appropriate long answers due to an effective comparison of all question-answer aspects, (b) has the ability to generalize from a small number of training examples, and (c) makes use of the information about syntactic roles of words. We show that our approach outperforms existing answer selection models by a large margin on six cQA datasets from different domains. Furthermore, we report the best results on the passage retrieval benchmark WikiPassageQA.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Improved Cross-Lingual Question Retrieval for Community Question Answering</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/Cross-Lingual-Question-Retrieval/</link>
      <description>We perform cross-lingual question retrieval in community question answering (cQA), i.e., we retrieve similar questions for queries that are given in another language. The standard approach to cross-lingual information retrieval, which is to automatically translate the query to the target language and continue with a monolingual retrieval model, typically falls short in cQA due to translation errors. This is even more the case for specialized domains such as in technical cQA, which we explore in this work. To remedy, we propose two extensions to this approach that improve cross-lingual question retrieval: (1) we enhance an NMT model with monolingual cQA data to improve the translation quality, and (2) we improve the robustness of a state-of-the-art neural question retrieval model to common translation errors by adding back-translations during training. Our results show that we achieve substantial improvements over the baseline approach and considerably close the gap to a setup where we have access to an external commercial machine translation service (i.e., Google Translate), which is often not the case in many practical scenarios.
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Text Processing Like Humans Do: Visually Attacking and Shielding NLP Systems</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/Visual-Adversarial-Attacks/</link>
      <description>Visual modifications to text are often used to obfuscate offensive comments in social media (e.g., ''!d10t'') or as a writing style (''1337'' in ''leet speak''), among other scenarios. We consider this as a new type of adversarial attack in NLP, a setting to which humans are very robust, as our experiments with both simple and more difficult visual perturbations demonstrate. We investigate the impact of visual adversarial attacks on current NLP systems on character-, word-, and sentence-level tasks, showing that both neural and non-neural models are, in contrast to humans, extremely sensitive to such attacks, suffering performance decreases of up to 82%. We then explore three shielding methods—visual character embeddings, adversarial training, and rule-based recovery—which substantially improve the robustness of the models. However, the shielding methods still fall behind performances achieved in non-attack scenarios, which demonstrates the difficulty of dealing with visual attacks.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pitfalls in the Evaluation of Sentence Embeddings</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/Pitfalls-Evaluation-Sentence-Embeddings/</link>
      <description>Deep learning models continuously break new records across different NLP tasks. At the same time, their success exposes weaknesses of model evaluation. Here, we compile several key pitfalls of evaluation of sentence embeddings, a currently very popular NLP paradigm. These pitfalls include the comparison of embeddings of different sizes, normalization of embeddings, and the low (and diverging) correlations between transfer and probing tasks. Our motivation is to challenge the current evaluation of sentence embeddings and to provide an easy-to-access reference for future research. Based on our insights, we also recommend better practices for better future evaluations of sentence embeddings.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Improving Generalization by Incorporating Coverage in Natural Language Inference</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/Improving-Generalization-Coverage/</link>
      <description>The task of natural language inference (NLI) is to identify the relation between the given premise and hypothesis. While recent NLI models achieve very high performance on individual datasets, they fail to generalize across similar datasets. This indicates that they are solving NLI datasets instead of the task itself. In order to improve generalization, we propose to extend the input representations with an abstract view of the relation between the hypothesis and the premise, i.e., how well the individual words, or word n-grams, of the hypothesis are covered by the premise. Our experiments show that the use of this information considerably improves generalization across different NLI datasets without requiring any external knowledge or additional data. Finally, we show that using the coverage information is not only beneficial for improving the performance across different datasets of the same task. The resulting generalization improves the performance across datasets that belong to similar but not the same tasks.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Neural Duplicate Question Detection without Labeled Training Data</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/Training-Methods-Duplicate-Question-Detection/</link>
      <description>Supervised training of neural models to duplicate question detection in community Question Answering (cQA) requires large amounts of labeled question pairs, which are costly to obtain. To minimize this cost, recent works thus often used alternative methods, e.g., adversarial domain adaptation. In this work, we propose two novel methods: (1) the automatic generation of duplicate questions, and (2) weak supervision using the title and body of a question. We show that both can achieve improved performances even though they do not require any labeled data. We provide comprehensive comparisons of popular training strategies, which provides important insights on how to best train models in different scenarios. We show that our proposed approaches are more effective in many cases because they can utilize larger amounts of unlabeled data from cQA forums. Finally, we also show that our proposed approach for weak supervision with question title and body information is also an effective method to train cQA answer selection models without direct answer supervision.
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Improving QA Generalization by Concurrent Modeling of Multiple Biases</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/QA-Biases/</link>
      <description>Existing NLP datasets contain various biases that models can easily exploit to achieve high performances on the corresponding evaluation sets. However, focusing on dataset-specific biases limits their ability to learn more generalizable knowledge about the task from more general data patterns. In this paper, we investigate the impact of debiasing methods for improving generalization and propose a general framework for improving the performance on both in-domain and out-of-domain datasets by concurrent modeling of multiple biases in the training data. Our framework weights each example based on the biases it contains and the strength of those biases in the training data. It then uses these weights in the training objective so that the model relies less on examples with high bias weights. We extensively evaluate our framework on extractive question answering with training data from various domains with multiple biases of different strengths. We perform the evaluations in two different settings, in which the model is trained on a single domain or multiple domains simultaneously, and show its effectiveness in both settings compared to state-of-the-art debiasing methods.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AdapterHub: A Framework for Adapting Transformers</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/AdapterHub/</link>
      <description>The current modus operandi in NLP involves downloading and fine-tuning pre-trained models consisting of millions or billions of parameters. Storing and sharing such large trained models is expensive, slow, and time-consuming, which impedes progress towards more general and versatile NLP methods that learn from and for many tasks. Adapters — small learnt bottleneck layers inserted within each layer of a pre-trained model — ameliorate this issue by avoiding full fine-tuning of the entire model. However, sharing and integrating adapter layers is not straightforward. We propose AdapterHub, a framework that allows dynamic "stitching-in" of pre-trained adapters for different tasks and languages. The framework, built on top of the popular HuggingFace Transformers library, enables extremely easy and quick adaptations of state-of-the-art pre-trained models (e.g., BERT, RoBERTa, XLM-R) across tasks and languages. Downloading, sharing, and training adapters is as seamless as possible using minimal changes to the training scripts and a specialized infrastructure. Our framework enables scalable and easy access to sharing of task-specific models, particularly in low-resource scenarios.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MultiCQA: Zero-Shot Transfer of Self-Supervised Text Matching Models on a Massive Scale</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/MultiCQA/</link>
      <description>We study the zero-shot transfer capabilities of text matching models on a massive scale, by self-supervised training on 140 source domains from community question answering forums in English. We investigate the model performances on nine benchmarks of answer selection and question similarity tasks, and show that all 140 models transfer surprisingly well, where the large majority of models substantially outperforms common IR baselines. We also demonstrate that considering a broad selection of source domains is crucial for obtaining the best zero-shot transfer performances, which contrasts the standard procedure that merely relies on the largest and most similar domains. In addition, we extensively study how to best combine multiple source domains. We propose to incorporate self-supervised with supervised multi-task learning on all available source domains. Our best zero-shot transfer model considerably outperforms in-domain BERT and the previous state of the art on six benchmarks. Fine-tuning of our model with in-domain data results in additional large gains and achieves the new state of the art on all nine benchmarks.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AdapterFusion: Non-Destructive Task Composition for Transfer Learning</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/AdapterFusion/</link>
      <description>Current approaches to solving classification tasks in NLP involve fine-tuning a pre-trained language model on a single target task. This paper focuses on sharing knowledge extracted not only from a pre-trained language model, but also from several source tasks in order to achieve better performance on the target task. Sequential fine-tuning and multi-task learning are two methods for sharing information, but suffer from problems such as catastrophic forgetting and difficulties in balancing multiple tasks. Additionally, multi-task learning requires simultaneous access to data used for each of the tasks, which does not allow for easy extensions to new tasks on the fly. We propose a new architecture as well as a two-stage learning algorithm that allows us to effectively share knowledge from multiple tasks while avoiding these crucial problems. In the first stage, we learn task specific parameters that encapsulate the knowledge from each task. We then combine these learned representations in a separate combination step, termed AdapterFusion. We show that by separating the two stages, i.e., knowledge extraction and knowledge combination, the classifier can effectively exploit the representations learned from multiple tasks in a non destructive manner. We empirically evaluate our transfer learning approach on 16 diverse NLP tasks, and show that it outperforms traditional strategies such as full fine-tuning of the model as well as multi-task learning.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TWEAC: Transformer with Extendable QA Agent Classifiers</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/TWEAC/</link>
      <description>Question answering systems should help users to access knowledge on a broad range of topics and to answer a wide array of different questions. Most systems fall short of this expectation as they are only specialized in one particular setting, e.g., answering factual questions with Wikipedia data. To overcome this limitation, we propose composing multiple QA agents within a meta-QA system. We argue that there exist a wide range of specialized QA agents in literature. Thus, we address the central research question of how to effectively and efficiently identify suitable QA agents for any given question. We study both supervised and unsupervised approaches to address this challenge, showing that TWEAC - Transformer with Extendable Agent Classifiers - achieves the best performance overall with 94% accuracy. We provide extensive insights on the scalability of TWEAC, demonstrating that it scales robustly to over 100 QA agents with each providing just 1000 examples of questions they can answer.
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Learning to Reason for Text Generation from Scientific Tables</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/SciGen/</link>
      <description>In this paper, we introduce SciGen, a new challenge dataset for the task of reasoning-aware data-to-text generation consisting of tables from scientific articles and their corresponding descriptions. Describing scientific tables goes beyond the surface realization of the table content and requires reasoning over table values. The unique properties of SciGen are that (1) tables mostly contain numerical values, and (2) the corresponding descriptions require arithmetic reasoning. SciGen is therefore the first dataset that assesses the arithmetic reasoning capabilities of generation models on complex input structures, i.e., tables from scientific articles. We study the effectiveness of state-of-the-art data-to-text generation models on SciGen and evaluate the results using common metrics as well as human evaluation. Our results and analyses show that (a) while humans like to reason for describing scientific tables, the ability of state-of-the-art models is severely limited on this task, (b) while adding more training data improves the results, it is not the solution for reasoning-aware text generation, and (c) one of the main bottlenecks for this task is the lack of proper automatic evaluation metrics. The data, code, and annotations for human evaluation will be available at https://github.com/UKPLab/SciGen. SciGen opens new avenues for future research in reasoning-aware text generation and evaluation.
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BEIR: Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/BEIR/</link>
      <description>Neural IR models have often been studied in homogeneous and narrow settings, which has considerably limited insights into their generalization capabilities. To address this, and to allow researchers to more broadly establish the effectiveness of their models, we introduce BEIR (Benchmarking IR), a heterogeneous benchmark for information retrieval. We leverage a careful selection of 17 datasets for evaluation spanning diverse retrieval tasks including open-domain datasets as well as narrow expert domains. We study the effectiveness of nine state-of-the-art retrieval models in a zero-shot evaluation setup on BEIR, finding that performing well consistently across all datasets is challenging. Our results show BM25 is a robust baseline and Reranking-based models overall achieve the best zero-shot performances, however, at high computational costs. In contrast, Dense-retrieval models are computationally more efficient but often underperform other approaches, highlighting the considerable room for improvement in their generalization capabilities. In this work, we extensively analyze different retrieval models and provide several suggestions that we believe may be useful for future work. BEIR datasets and code are available at https://github.com/UKPLab/beir
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What to Pre-Train on? Efficient Intermediate Task Selection</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/Adapter-Transfer/</link>
      <description>Intermediate task fine-tuning has been shown to culminate in large transfer gains across many NLP tasks. With an abundance of candidate datasets as well as pre-trained language models, it has become infeasible to run the cross-product of all combinations to find the best transfer setting. In this work we first establish that similar sequential fine-tuning gains can be achieved in adapter settings, and subsequently consolidate previously proposed methods that efficiently identify beneficial tasks for intermediate transfer learning. We experiment with a diverse set of 42 intermediate and 11 target English classification, multiple choice, question answering, and sequence tagging tasks. Our results show that efficient embedding based methods that rely solely on the respective datasets outperform computational expensive few-shot fine-tuning approaches. Our best methods achieve an average Regret@3 of less than 1% across all target tasks, demonstrating that we are able to efficiently identify the best datasets for intermediate training.
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AdapterDrop: On the Efficiency of Adapters in Transformers</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/AdapterDrop/</link>
      <description>Massively pre-trained transformer models are computationally expensive to fine-tune, slow for inference, and have large storage requirements. Recent approaches tackle these shortcomings by training smaller models, dynamically reducing the model size, and by training light-weight adapters. In this paper, we propose AdapterDrop, removing adapters from lower transformer layers during training and inference, which incorporates concepts from all three directions. We show that AdapterDrop can dynamically reduce the computational overhead when performing inference over multiple tasks simultaneously, with minimal decrease in task performances. We further prune adapters from AdapterFusion, which improves the inference efficiency while maintaining the task performances entirely.
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Efficient NLP Policy Document</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/Efficient-NLP-Policy-Doc/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Surveying (Dis) Parities and Concerns of Compute Hungry NLP Research</title>
      <link>http://rueckle.net/publication/Efficient-NLP-Survey-Resources/</link>
      <description>Many recent improvements in NLP stem from the development and use of large pre-trained language models (PLMs) with billions of parameters. Large model sizes makes computational cost one of the main limiting factors for training and evaluating such models; and has raised severe concerns about the sustainability, reproducibility, and inclusiveness for researching PLMs. These concerns are often based on personal experiences and observations. However, there had not been any large-scale surveys that investigate them. In this work, we provide a first attempt to quantify these concerns regarding three topics, namely, environmental impact, equity, and impact on peer reviewing. By conducting a survey with 312 participants from the NLP community, we capture existing (dis)parities between different and within groups with respect to seniority, academia, and industry; and their impact on the peer reviewing process. For each topic, we provide an analysis and devise recommendations to mitigate found disparities, some of which already successfully implemented. Finally, we discuss additional concerns raised by many participants in free-text responses.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
